Skip to main content

Realism and Liberalism, A Breakdown

Realism and Liberalism are the two most popular schools of thought in International Relations, these two philosophies get thrown around a lot when discussing political issues, however, many a times these two schools of thought get misinterpreted and used in the wrong context. 
Keeping in mind that these two philosophies are both as valid as each other, neither is wrong and both are valid political philosophies. Lets Start with Realism;

International organizations from a realist perspective

Realism Is a view of international politics that portrays the international structure as anarchical, that is, an anarchic environment in which there is no world government to impose structure and stability, states therefore engage in self-help behaviour to ensure their longevity. Its anarchical nature heightens the interaction between states and competing interests, and this heightened interaction has the potential to scale into military conflict.
The Term International Organizations from a realist perspective refers to the patters of order that can arise in this anarchical state, from the interaction between great powers and their self-interest. The Realist perspective argues that international co-operation occurs under only 3 circumstances; Security Alliances, Polarity and Hegemonic stability.

Polarity refers to the relative distribution of capabilities in the international system during a particular time period. There are multiple types of Polarity that can occur in the international system and each system of polarity leads to different forms of IO’s and global governance;
·         Multipolar system of International Governance
·         Bipolar System of International Governance
·         Unipolar System of International Governance- the Contemporary International Order, in which the US became the main actor after the Cold war.

Hegemonic Stability occurs when a predominant state uses its greater capabilities to shape international politics for the promotion of order, stability and co-operation, most of the IGOs(International Government Organisations) that have help establish contemporary international co-operation can be traced back to American Hegemony post-World War II.

Strengths and weaknesses 
Realism serves as a corrective for the contemporary liberal ideals and goals that tend to fail to acknowledge the relative power that is required between states to support these ideals. However Realism itself fails to acknowledge the importance of NSA’s(Non-State Actors) and fails to acknowledge the social construction of the international scene because of its rationalist ideals.




Classic Liberal Internationalism and Global Governance

Liberalism Is a view of international politics that can be described as the opposite of realism.  Liberal internationalism is more optimistic between interstate interactions and posits a zone of peace and cooperation amongst states. Classic Liberal Internationalism ideology includes free trades, self-determination, and non-intervention in the matters of other states.
Liberal Internationalism did not emerge as a theory of International Relations; rather, it evolved from an ideology into an analytical framework, meaning that Internationalism has always been a part of the global governance, although it was not part of the international scene. The nineteenth century is where liberalism began to take centre stage, as it develops in some countries as a national political movement, it is here that the ideology of 'free trade brings on cooperation between states' emerges. Early twentieth century internationalism interacted more with international organisations bringing forth the creation of IOs(International Organisations) and the proactive welfare state served as a model for international cooperation.

Strengths and weaknesses
 With the removal of certain barriers of trade, spread of democracy, and the emergence of IOs- all of which are significant parts of the Liberalist ideology- Liberalism became less of an ideology and more of a reality. Liberalism receives criticism, however, mostly in relation as to how do liberal internationalists achieve these goals? As they all have the shared belief in international progress but they have different approaches to reaching said goal.


Conclusion
Realism and Liberal internationalism are perhaps the most accepted schools of thought in IR. Both draw their analysis from the philosophical understanding of human nature. It is hard to argue that one is better than the other as that comes down to personal opinion, however, it is hard to deny that  the analytical nature of these two theories have allowed us great understanding and possibly changed the way we look at IO and global governance

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is It too early to Claim an Asian Century?

With the United States' decreased influence in the international scene, a power vacuum has emerged in consequence. While usually there have been ups and downs in terms of US influence in the world, president Trump's "America First" philosophy doesn't look to attempt to regain US dominance, in fact, at times it seems as if president Trump isn't really focused on the impact that his policies will have on the international scene, and whether or not he should be is a discussion for another time. As an example, Trump's decision to leave the Paris climate Accord has left a huge leadership gap, one that China-with its 'aggressive' plan to fight carbon emission- would be very keen to fill. In recent years, there has been a transfer of wealth and power from the 'old world order'- dominated by the United States and Europe- to non-western states. It is without a doubt the end of the 'American Century' but perhaps it may be imprudent to claim an…

Nationalism, An ideology of Pride and Identity.

Nationalism, in simple terms, is a sense of pride and identity to one's own nation, whether it'd be where you are born and have lived or where your family heritage comes from. This pride and identity have always played a significant part in human history; our ideologies, our social life, our economy are always in the interest of making ourselves- and our nation- proud. However as we have seen, time and time again in history this pride has found its way into our political and social ideologies, developing that sense of pride into hateful discrimination- usually against a minority group.
The 20th century was marked by nationalism, 2 major global conflicts leaving millions dead and countless other 'smaller' scale wars left the world in a state of chaos and shambles. Sadly, it looks like we are bound to repeat the mistakes made in the previous century as we seem to be foolishly ignoring our last 100 years of wars for the 'nation'. After World War 2 many alliances we…

G-19; The Decline of the USA as a global power

A few weeks ago, I revisited a question I answered for one of my classes while I was at uni; "Is it too early to claim an Asian century". The essay focused on the decline of American influence in the global order in recent years, and attempted to predict what would become of the world order. I predicted that the USA would "still remain an influential actor in the International stage as its legacy of pursuing common global goals will ensure that other nations continue to seek its help; perhaps not as a ruler, but as a leader.". Sadly, however, it seems that with the election of Trump into the oval office, the USA has lost a lot of  its capability to lead the world order.  With the recent G20 summit, President Trump's inexperience, limited capabilities and obsessive need to be the centre of attention wherever he goes, left him- and with him the USA- isolated in a conference where most countries involved where ready to follow the US and ready to put pressure on Chi…